TMI Blog2012 (8) TMI 650X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at the complete information was provided to the Respondent only on 6th March 2010 – penalty upheld - 5945 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 1-9-2010 - S. Muralidhar, J. REPRESENTED BY : S/Shri B. Badrinath with Dr. Puran Chand, Advocates for S. Rajappa, Advocate, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order]. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 6th April 2010 pass ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the penalty was restricted to a sum of Rs. 25,000/- calculated at the fixed statutory rate of Rs. 250/- per day for 100 days delay. The non-exhaustion of the remedy of a first appeal by the Respondent would not have made any difference to the fact that the complete information was provided to the Respondent only on 6th March 2010. 4. The petition and the pending application are dismissed. - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|