2012 (9) TMI 443

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nst the appellant may cause prejudice to the appellant. - what would be the reasonable arm’s length price at the hands of ANR/PE and not the profits earned by the assessee. - Review Petitions admitted against the original decision (2011 (8) TMI 313 - DELHI HIGH COURT). - Rev. Pet. No.658 of 2011 in ITA No.1278 of 2010; Rev. Pet. No.663 of 2011 in ITA No.1280 of 2010; Rev. Pet. No.662 of 2011 in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... stions of law raised by the assessee on which its appeals were admitted have not been addressed in the judgment. Gist of the submissions of the assessee in this behalf was taken note of in order dated 03.2.2012 wherein it was recorded that ITA 1278/2010 was treated as lead matter. The appeal was admitted on 7 questions of law framed as a to g . Question no.1 pertains to the business connection .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this question may not arise for consideration. Otherwise, it is argued, as per the appellant the questions of business connection and PE also survive. It is further submitted that on question no. e , the matter is referred back to the Assessing Officer, therefore the aforesaid finding qua Question no. a to d recorded against the appellant in para 36 may cause prejudice to the appellant. In re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X