9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (10) TMI 881X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... EW PETITION (C ) NOs. 655-662 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 7945-7946 & 7948-7953 OF 2010 WITH REVIEW PETITION (C ) NOs. 1642-1645 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOs . 7955, 7957, 7960 & 7961 OF 2010 O R D E R 1) At the foremost, we have carefully gone through the review petition filed by the Union of India and the connected papers and heard the arguments of Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, learn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ct and whether it can be said that there is proof of service on the Union of India. 2) In view of the above assertion on behalf of the Union of India about the defective service, we called for a Report from the Registry. We received a Report dated 26.09.2012 from Registrar (Judicial-I) about the service and the office report for the same. The Report states that the notice was indeed not served to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Attorney General by learned senior counsel for the respondents, as mentioned above, we are satisfied that the Union of India was not given an opportunity to represent its case due to mistake on the part of the Registry. Applying the well settled principles governing a review petition and giving our anxious and careful consideration to the facts and circumstances of this case, we have come to the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
