9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (11) TMI 876X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant in the month of June, 2008 cannot be said to be a violation of the conditions of Notification No. 93/2004 since the amendment took place only in July, 2008 - it may be violation of Foreign Trade Policy but that would attract penal provisions under the relevant statute and not under the Customs Act. - C/695/2010 - S/15/2012-WZB/C-I(CSTB) - Dated:- 20-12-2011 - S/Shri B.S.V. Murthy, Ash ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... acturer. The appellant fulfilled the export obligation and diverted the surplus material to their own unit in June, 2008. However, before this diversion took place, Foreign Trade Policy had been amended and restriction of diversion of imported material was made applicable to their own units also which have availed the benefit of Notification No. 39/2001-C.E. which are located in Kutch area of Guja ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er the Customs notification. Therefore, the diversion of materials by the appellant in the month of June, 2008 cannot be said to be a violation of the conditions of Notification No. 93/2004 since the amendment took place only in July, 2008. No doubt, it may be violation of Foreign Trade Policy but that would attract penal provisions under the relevant statute and not under the Customs Act. 3. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
