2013 (1) TMI 196

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... han what is admissible as per the Rules - Held that:- looking into the practicality the request of the appellant be accepted and directed to provide information to the appellant within 5 working days of the receipt of payment by the appellant. In favour of assessee - CIC/AA/A/2012/273 and CIC/CPIO/2012/766 - - - Dated:- 10-7-2012 - Ms. Anita Gupta, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri R.K. Jain, the A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ement on institution and disposal of cases in each registry runs into 9 pages which will be provided after payment of Rs. 18 @ of Rs. 2/- per page as photocopying charges. Vide letter dated 30th May 2012, the appellant sent postal order of Rs. 20/- and stated that excess amount of Rupees 2/- is waived in his favour. On 5th June 2012, Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, informed the appellant that CPIO of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t fee stamps available of specified denomination and it is accepted as proper stamp duty or court fee. Therefore, order of CPIO is incorrect and illegal and liable to be set aside. 5. During the hearing, Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, nodal CPIO argued that the appellant has other modes also available to him for making exact payment of Rupees 18/-. RTI Fee and Cost Rules provide payment of Rs. 2/- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X