9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (1) TMI 319X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dismissal of W.P.(C) No.6556/2012 preferred by the appellants. The said writ petition was preferred challenging the order dated 30.08.2012 of the Central Information Commission (CIC) dismissing the Second Appeal preferred by the appellants against the order dated 21.05.2011 of the First Appellate Authority. The First Appellate Authority had dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellants against ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ellant No.2 had been removed from service of the respondent Bank; that the appellants had sought information on 39 points; that the grievance of the appellants was that misleading and vague information had been provided on the points raised in the RTI application; that the appellants had filed 50 to 60 RTI applications in their names, separately, together as well as in the names of their friends a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d the said obligation had been fulfilled. 5. The counsel for the appellants does not controvert the factum of a number of RTI applications having been filed by the appellants themselves or through other persons to the PIO of the respondent Bank. He has however drawn attention to the information sought at serial Nos.11 to 14 and 26 of the RTI application and the response thereto and on the basis t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... formation furnished. Moreover, there is a categorical finding of the CIC, of the appellants misusing the RTI Act, as is also evident from the plethora of RTI applications filed by the appellants. In view of the said factual findings of the CIC and which is not interfered by the learned Single Judge, we are not inclined to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. 7. We do not find any ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
