2013 (8) TMI 303

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ore, the Commissioner (Appeals) has rightly rejected their appeal for non-compliance of the provisions of Section 35 – Decided against the Assessee. - Appeal No.: E/10930 of 2013 - - - Dated:- 16-5-2013 - Mr. Sahab Singh and Mr. Anil Choudhary, JJ. For the Respondent: Shri H. Mathew, A.R. Per: Mr. Sahab Singh; None appeared for the appellant. This appeal is filed by M/s. Savita Oil T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner, Central Excise, Division-II, Silvassa. Appellants preferred appeal against the said order, challenging the quantification of the duty of Rs. 27,196/for the period July 2011 to November 2011 before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). Appellant did not file any stay petition before the Commissioner (Appeals). Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order has rejected their appeal for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X