2013 (8) TMI 543

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ar ld. Counsel submits that there was no misdeclaration but only for the mistake, the spare parts were considered to be misdeclared goods by Customs. Ld. Adjudicating Authority misconstrued the facts and made adjudication arbitrary. 2. Revenue supports the adjudication. 3. Shri S.C. Rasthogi, Head of Accounts of the appellant present today clarified status of the consignments. It appears from th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Customs also found that the goods already found in 5 earlier bill of entries as depicted in adjudication order involved import of goods valued at Rs.1,29,61,204/-. It was admitted by the appellant that the goods were misdeclared and those were already cleared, not being confiscated. The appellant deposited differential duty. Penalty of Rs.10,00,000/- was imposed in respect of goods cleared earlier .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X