Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1994 (9) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and agricultural implements at Sri Ganganagar. They are registered dealers under the Central Sales Tax Act (in short, "the CST Act" and "the RST Act"). They supply furniture and boxes to various departments of the Central Government located at Sri Ganganagar. Assessment orders were passed under section 10 of the RST Act in respect of the assessment year 1989-90. They have now received notices under section 12 of the RST Act for showing cause as to why reassessment be not made as in the earlier assessments sales tax had been calculated at lesser rate of 4 per cent than the prescribed rates of 10 per cent or 12 per cent. 3.. In the Writ Petitions Nos. 2334 of 1988 and 5591 of 1991, the respondents have filed replies to show cause notices stating that the said notices are valid, they do not offend articles 14, 301, 302, 303 or 304A of the Constitution and the notices under section 12 of the RST Act have rightly been issued as furniture was sold and tax at the rate of 4 per cent had been paid instead of 10 per cent or 12 per cent. 4.. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that a dealer outside Rajasthan selling goods to Central Government departments sit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nts situated in other States. The same commodities supplied by a trader of Rajasthan to the same Government departments attract sales tax under the RST Act at the rate specified in the notification issued under section 5 of the RST Act. The traders of other States selling goods in Rajasthan form a different class of persons from the traders of Rajasthan selling goods in Rajasthan. This is a reasonable classification and is permissible under article 14 of the Constitution of India. 7.. State has discretion to prescribe different rates of tax for different goods and may also exempt any commodity. Article 14 of the Constitution is not attracted. It has been observed in Sita Ram Bishambhar Dayal v. State of U.P. [1972] 29 STC 206 (SC) at pages 207-208; AIR 1972 SC 1168, para 5, as follows: "It is true that the power to fix a rate of tax is a legislative power but if the Legislature lays down the legislative policy and provides the necessary guidelines, that power can be delegated to the executive. Though a tax is levied primarily for the purpose of gathering revenue, in selecting the objects to be taxed and in determining the rate of tax, various economic and social aspects such as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng, in the market facilities foreign and inland, in the price and in the variety of uses to which they are put and also the class of customers that take to them.' Thus, it will be seen that Virginia tobacco has features which distinguish it from country tobacco, and can be treated as a class in itself. It will therefore be within the power of the State to impose a tax on the sales of Virginia tobacco while exempting the country tobacco." 9. It has been held in Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot v. State of Madhya Pradesh [1958] 9 STC 388 (SC); [1959] SCR 427, as under: "..........Now, the authorities are clear that it is not unconstitutional for the Legislature to leave it to the executive to determine details relating to the working of taxation laws, such as the selection of persons on whom the tax is to be laid, the rates at which it is to be charged in respect of different classes of goods, and the like." 10.. Article 301 of the Constitution provides that subject to the other provisions of this Part xiii, trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be free. Articles 302, 303 and 304 empower the Parliament and Legislature of State to impose restri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ated the 17th March, 1990 Circular It has been brought to the notice of the Government that some autonomous bodies are not following the instructions issued vide this department circular No. F. 5(8)FD/RRA A/76-I dated January 19, 1987. While making any purchases they must compare the rates quoted by firms outside Rajasthan and those in Rajasthan and while doing so the element of Rajasthan sales tax shall be excluded whereas that of Central sales tax shall be included. Non-observance of the aforesaid circular has been viewed seriously by the Government. It is therefore, emphasised again that all Government corporations/companies/ public undertakings should follow these explicit instructions while making purchase. Sd/ (Y. Singh) Finance Commissioner and Secretary." As a result of these circulars, there remains no discrimination in between the dealers of outside Rajasthan and dealers of Rajasthan. 12. The next question for consideration is whether the notices (annexure 3 in all the writ petitions) issued under section 12 deserve to be quashed. Notification No. F.4(3) FD/Gr. IV/79-2 dated March 5, 1979, was issued under section 4(2) of the Act. It would be best to q .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ......department of Government for its use and not for use in execution of a works contract executed by a contractor for the Government and also not for the purpose of resale or for use in the manufacture of goods for sale. Seal of the duly authorised Signature................................ officer of the Government. Designation of the authorised officer of the Government. Place.............. Date..............." This notification has been amended by Notification No. F.4(3)FD/Gr. IV/ 79-34 dated February 26, 1980. This list of exclusion of goods include furniture and office equipments including metal furniture and cabinetwares at item No. 5. By exclusion, wooden boxes attracted concessional rate of tax at 4 per cent. The case of the assessing authority is that the petitioners showed in their returns the sale of wooden boxes and in fact they sold furniture and they paid tax at the concessional rate at 4 per cent instead of 10 per cent and 12 per cent payable on furniture actually sold. Under these facts and circumstances, the levy of tax at the lesser rate while making assessment under section 10 of the RST Act attracted the provisions of section 12 of the RST Act and the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates