9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (9) TMI 564X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r 1983-84. By that order, it has been held that a sum of Rs. 2,06,223 is includible in the taxable turnover on the ground that the amount represents the value of the inter-State sales. The Joint Commissioner has also held that the penalty of Rs. 1,216 is leviable on the assessee. In doing so, the Joint Commissioner set aside the order made by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... also recorded his view that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner should have remanded the matter back to the assessing officer for verification of the records. Inspite of having stated so, the Joint Commissioner himself did not remand the matter to the assessing officer for that purpose but proceeded to ignore those records and held the assessee liable to tax in respect of these transaction. 3.. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
