2013 (11) TMI 1098

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er allowed. - E/1579/2998 - - - Dated:- 14-6-2013 - Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, J. For the Appellant: Ms. Rashi, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri R. K. Verma, AR ORDER Per Achana Wadhwa The miscellaneous applications is for recalling of Final order No. 454/2011 SM (BR) dated 20.07.2011 vide which the appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. After going through the said order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... justified nor in accordance with law. 4. I agree with the Ld. Advocate that when the advocate is appearing before the bench and seeking adjournment, it cannot be said that the appellant is not interest in pursuing the appeal and dismissal of the same for the non-prosecution is not appropriate. Accordingly, 1 re-call the said order and allow ROA application. Appeal is fixed for final disposal on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X