9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (12) TMI 974X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for a lower level of deposit. For the period under dispute in the present appeal, no such evidence has been produced and therefore a higher amount of pre-deposit should be called for since the matter is already decided against a similarly placed assesses in the case of LCS City Makers Ltd. Vs CST Chennai - [2012 (6) TMI 363 - CESTAT, CHENNAI] - Prima facie case against assessee - Stay denied. - S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f construction of flats to the persons to whom rights in land were sold. So, Revenue issued a demand for tax not paid the period October 09 to September 10. After adjudication, an amount of Rs.25,87,835/- is confirmed along with and penalty. Aggrieved by the order, appellant filed appeal before Tribunal along with stay application for waiver of pre-deposit of dues for admission of appeal. 2. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the matter is already decided against a similarly placed assesses in the case of LCS City Makers Ltd. Vs CST Chennai - 2013 (30) S.T.R. 33 (Tri. - Chennai). 3. Considered the submissions on both sides. Prima facie, there is very strong case for Revenue in their favour. So, we direct the applicant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.12,50,000/- (Rupees Twelve lakhs fifty thousand only) within a perio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
