9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 323X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch, the appellant was granted a waiver – but the assessee did not comply with the order - the appellant moved an application for restoration of appeal which was heard on 12.03.13 and the stay petition and appeal was restored - Since this is a restored stay petition and appeal, the adjournment sought by the appellant’s declined - Following Shri Mafatlal Harkchand Shah Versus Commissioner of Central ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s heard with other stay petition filed by M/s. Shital Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Shital Tubes Pvt. Ltd. was directed to deposit some amount. On compliance of which, the current appellant was granted a waiver. The said M/s. Shital Tubes Pvt. Ltd. did not comply with our order, hence, we dismissed their appeal and the appeal filed by the current appellant was also dismissed for the same reason. Subseq ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e case of Shri Mafatlal H. Shah will apply in the stay petition in hand. Respectfully following the same, we direct the appellant herein to pre-deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of eight weeks from today and report compliance on 18.06.13 before Deputy Registrar. The Deputy Registrar on ascertaining such compliance, will place the file before the bench on 25.06.13 for further order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
