2004 (2) TMI 664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ithdrawn on the ground that the dealer had failed to file change of land use certificate (for short, "the CLU") along with application in form ST-70 on the basis of which it had been granted. This matter was considered by this Court in R.K. Mittal Woollen Mills v. State of Haryana [2001] 123 STC 248; (2000) 15 PHT 261 and Baldev Spinners Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana [2003] 132 STC 594; (2003) 21 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntrolled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1973, that CLU has to be obtained before setting up a new industry. He further contended that in the present case the dealer has violated the provisions of sections 6.12 and 23(3) of the said Act as well. 3.. We find no merit in the contention raised on behalf of the respondents. As far as the case of Nice Spinners [2001] 121 STC 456 (P .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n against the petitioner for the alleged violation, on a query from the Bench it has also been conceded that no action has been initiated against the members of the Screening Committee which had granted the eligibility certificate without the CLU. 4.. In view of the above, we are satisfied that the dispute in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in R.K. Mi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X