2014 (2) TMI 963

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in transactions by this appellant. That adjudication order does not show role of the present appellant causing prejudice to revenue. Learned Adjudicating Authority simply basing on an affidavit held that the appellant had a criminal intention. Unless cogent evidence is brought to record to say that retraction in affidavit is untruthful and the appellant was instrumental to create fake documents, r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m. Therefore, cause title should be read as Shri Parmod Kumar C/o. G. Tex Dyeing Printing Mills Ltd. 2. M/s. G. Tex Dyeing Printing Mills Ltd. was appellant in Appeal No. E/612/2005, which was dismissed for non-compliance to the stay order. The said assessee was commonly adjudicated along with the present appellant in terms of adjudication Order No. 8/2004, dated 5th February, 2004. 3. In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X