2005 (2) TMI 800

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ministration), Purnea (respondent No. 3), he came to this Court and this Court by an order dated September 1, 2004 as contained in annexure 7 directed him to dispose of the revision application and thereafter the impugned order as contained in annexure 9 has been passed. The respondent No. 3 has disposed of the revision application by saying that he has no power to entertain the application filed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ty days of the date of communication of the order sought to be revised: Provided further that where the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant had sufficient cause for not applying within time, he may condone the delay." 2.. Suo motu power is vested in the authority to see the legality and propriety of the order, which the authority can either do on his own instance or if any illegali .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X