9911796707
TMI Blog2005 (8) TMI 637X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... RDER:- The order of the Court was made by B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.--Notwithstanding the strenuous contentions urged by Sri C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not persuaded to accept any one of the contentions. 2.. The impugned order dated July 28, 2005 of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Hyderabad, rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated July 21, 20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... VAT dealer to make the claim after the expiry of ten days of the prescribed time but not later than thirty days from the date of commencement of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It is not as if the Deputy Commissioner is clothed with any authority to keep on extending the time. The mandate enshrined in rule 37(2)(h) of the Rules referred to hereinabove is absolutely clear. The rule i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that are presented before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner are impugned. The said orders upon which reliance is placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not impugned before us in any one of the writ petitions. 6.. For the aforesaid reasons, no relief could be granted to the petitioner in this writ petition. The writ petition shall accordingly stand dismissed. Writ petiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
