TMI Blog2014 (3) TMI 411X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for condonation of delay - Held that:- Following decision of Sri Vasavi Agencies vs. CCE Visakhapatnam reported in [2007 (11) TMI 544 - CESTAT, BANGALORE] - Condonation denied. - Appeal No. E/87340/13-Mum - - - Dated:- 7-1-2014 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, J. For the Appellant : Shri Mihir Mehta, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri B S Meena, Addl. Commissioner, AR JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bmits that each party has to file appeals separately and as per the impugned order the appeal had to be filed before this Tribunal in time. Therefore, the reason given for the delay is not sustainable and in the eyes of the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Sri Vasavi Agencies vs. CCE Visakhapatnam reported in 2009 (245) ELT 539 (Tri. Bang) and Commissioner of Customs vs. Bharat Bhushan Aga ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|