2010 (4) TMI 1007

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the Haryana Tax Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short, the Tribunal ) vide its order dated January 18, 2006 wherein the following question of law has been raised: (i) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Haryana Tax Tribunal was justified in holding that sale of gunny bags should have been taxed at the rate of four per cent instead of 12 per cent? (ii) Whether, on the f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... are estopped from assailing the same question for the earlier years. It is pertinent to mention here that assessment in the present case pertains to the years 1995-96. Counsel for the assessee has placed reliance on the judgement of the Division Bench in GSTR No.69 of 1997 decided on February 3, 2009, M/s. Hyderabad Industries Ltd., Faridabad v. State of Haryana [2010] 28 VST 344 (P H), wherein it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X