2010 (11) TMI 877

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arwal, learned standing counsel for the opposite parties. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present revision has been decided at the admission stage. Facts, in brief , as stated by Sri S.M.K. Chaudhary, senior advocate are that initially an order has been passed by the assessing authority under section 25(1) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008. Aggrieved by the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed October 27, 2010 passed by the Tribunal. Sri S.M.K. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the revisionist, submits that the impugned order dated October 27, 2010 is in contravention to the law as laid down by the honourable Supreme Court in the case of Pennar Industries Ltd. v. State of A.P. [2009] 39 NTN 126. And also the law as laid down by this court in the case of Kribhco Shyam Fertilizers L .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X