9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (7) TMI 1038X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... earned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this revision petition challenging the impugned order dated July 6, 2007 passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer, whereby the petitioner's appeal has been dismissed. The assessing officer vide its order dated July 9, 2002, levied penalty under section 78(10)(a) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, but on an appeal filed by th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssigned by both the appellate authorities for setting aside the penalty order passed by the assessing officer. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that all the required documents, as per provisions of section 78(2)(b) of the Act of 1994, were available and produced at the time of checking of vehicle/goods and required tax had already been paid by the assessee. So far as seal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
