9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 649X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Special Court), District Gurgaon, Haryana, on 14.6.2010 issued Summons to the Appellant. The Appellant thereupon approached the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, which passed the impugned order. On 23.9.2013, this Court issued notice and also ordered that proceedings before the Trial Court shall remain stayed. It is evident, therefore, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1 Leave granted. 2 This Appeal assails the Order of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab Haryana holding that since the notice as contemplated in Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, the NI Act ), had been dispatched from Gurgaon, Haryana and additionally, a response thereto was dispatched to and received at Gurgaon, Courts at Gurgaon possessed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oured cheques were drawn on the Appellant s Bank, namely, Axis Bank, Bangalore. Subsequently, on presentation of the cheques for encashment by the Respondent through its Bankers, namely, Standard Chartered Bank, Bangalore, they were dishonoured. It is interesting to note, even though it may not be relevant for the present considerations, that the Respondent has filed a suit for recovery of money i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Respondent, a legal notice of demand has emanated from that city. The Complaint be returned to the Complainant/Respondent for refilling in the appropriate Court at Bangalore, Karnataka. As mentioned in Dashrath Rupsingh, if the Complaint is re-filed in the appropriate Court in Bangalore within 30 days, it shall be deemed to have been filed within limitation. The interim orders stand recalled, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
