2014 (10) TMI 36

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') dated November 29, 2013, the Revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal, raising the following question of law: "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts, in confirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) for allowing the loss on trading of Future & Options of Rs. 14,03,442/- incurred by the Assessee in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ss on trading of F&O. Thus, there was absence of any reasons while disallowing such loss. 3. When the matter travelled to the Commissioner (Appeals), it noted that there was no reason for rejection of claim for loss of F&O transaction and that was not justifiable. Accordingly, the said disallowance was deleted. When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, it concurred with the findings of the Commi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ased on factual matrix, by detailed reasons, which we do not find it necessary to ingeminate at this stage and we have dismissed such appeal. Since the facts in this appeal are also similar in nature, we see no reason to interfere. There arises no question of law much less any substantial question of law to interfere. Hence, the Tax Appeal is, resultantly, dismissed.
Case laws, Decisions, Judg .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X