TMI Blog2014 (10) TMI 731X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the demand of service tax along with interest has been confirmed for the period 1995-96 to 1996-97 against the proprietorship concern owned by Beharilal H. Harlalka who died on 23-5-1999. 2. Brief facts of the case are that during the time of audit of the unit of the appellant, it came to the knowl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not imposable on the successor. The appellant aggrieved by the order of confirmation of service tax along with interest is in appeal before me. 3. Heard both the sides. 4. The contention of the appellant is that as per the provisions of Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, a demand cannot be recovered from the successor of a person who has not paid the service tax during the im ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|