TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 788X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... issue is covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Cognizant Technology Solutions Ltd. Vs. CCE - [2010 (3) TMI 328 - CESTAT, CHENNAI]. We find that the issue will be decided after examining the documents. Hence the applicant failed to make out a strong prima facie for waiver of entire amount of dues - Partial stay granted. - ST/353/2011 - Misc. Order No.41257 & 41258/2014 - Dated ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sys for FINACLE. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of tax of ₹ 95,68,100/- along with interest and penalty under the category of ;Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service;. The learned AR on behalf of Revenue submits that this issue is covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Future Focus Infotech Vs. CCE - 2010 (18) STR 308. On the other hand, the learned c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|