2012 (9) TMI 890

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is fundamentally misconceived besides being barred by laches and delays. 2. This appeal is directed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore (CESTAT) dated 4-3-2008 [2008 (232) E.L.T. 335 (Tri. - Bang.)] condoning the delay of 1066 days in preferring an appeal against the ord .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tition which also ended in dismissal on 10-7-2006. By the order dated 17-1-2007 the Settlement Commissioner rejected the assessee's application for settlement. It is not clear from the record as to when the order of the Settlement Commissioner dated 17-1-2007 rejecting the assessee's application for settlement, was communicated to the assessee. Be that as it may, in the aforesaid circumstances the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X