9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (12) TMI 322X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... NT Per : Mr. H.K.Thakur,; When this appeal was called out for hearing, appellants submitted that the modification application E/others/14938/2014 has been filed by the appellant which is also listed on 1/9/2014. 2. Shri P M Dave (Adv.) and Shri N K Tiwari (Cons.) appeared on behalf pf the appellant. Shri P M Dave (Adv.) argued that in order No. M/12349/2014 dt 1/5/2014 appellant has been asked ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ross examination of the witnesses requested by the appellant was rejected. That the case of M/s Atithi Gokul Automobile Works and the case of present appellant were listed on the same date as per the orders passed by the Honble Gujarat High Court. It was, therefore, argued on behalf of the appellant that Honble Tribunal may waive the condition of pre-deposit of amounts ordered till the disposal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e case records. The main ground of seeking modification by the appellant is that this Bench in similar facts and circumstance, as per order No. A/10885-10886/2014 dt 1/5/2014 in the case of M/s Atithi Gokul Automobile Works, have remanded the case back to the Adjudicating Authority. It is the case of the appellant for modification of pre-deposit order that the facts involve in the present appeal a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al justice when the appellant himself remains absent in the adjudication proceedings. On merit also this Bench has give its observation while passing stay order and held that the issue need deeper considerations which could be done only at the time of final disposal of the appeal. At the same time, it is also recorded that no claim of severe financial hardship is available from the case records as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
