2014 (12) TMI 711

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d. Consultant for the Applicant, even today, could not be spelt out the name of the said staff, who met an accident. In these circumstances, we find deficiency in the bonafideness of the Applicant about the facts narrated in the Miscellaneous Application stating reasons for delay. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Living Media India Ltd. Vs. Office of the Chief Post Master General : [2012 ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld. Consultant was directed to file detailed affidavit with date chart in support of the Application seeking condonation of delay. Pursuant to the said direction, the ld. Consultant placed an affidavit of Shri Partho Sarathi Paul, practising as a Chartered Accountant at Ranchi. In the said affidavit, the principal reason for the delay is mentioned at Para 4 stating that the staff of the Chartered .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the bonafideness of the Applicant about the facts narrated in the Miscellaneous Application stating reasons for delay. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Living Media India Ltd. Vs. Office of the Chief Post Master General : 2012 (277) ELT 289 (S.C.), has specifically laid down that while considering the application of condonation for delay, bonafideness of the applicant needs to be examine .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X