2012 (2) TMI 445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mand notice calling upon the petitioner to pay about ₹ 68,00,000 (rupees sixty eight lakhs only) towards tax for the year 2007-08. On receipt of exhibit P1 the petitioner filed exhibit P2 application for rectification and had also filed an appeal against exhibit P1. Meanwhile, revenue recovery proceedings were initiated and that was challenged before this court in Writ Petition No. 6906 of 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ioner is that since exhibits P1 and P6 orders are totally illegal, the condition imposed by the appellate authority cannot be sustained. I am unable to accept the said contention. The merits of the controversy are matters to be decided as and when the appeal is finally heard and the question now is whether the appellate authority was justified in passing a conditional order. In my view, in the fac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X