TMI Blog2015 (1) TMI 755X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2002 - High Court admitted appeal on the following substantial questions of law:- Whether CESTAT was justified in applying the ratio of this Hon’ble High Court judgment in Indorama Synthetics [2007 (7) TMI 315 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY] to the facts in the present case? Whether Tribunal was justified in invoking the ratio of this Hon’ble Court’s judgment in Indorama Synthetics whi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nthetics (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex, Nagpur reported in 2007 (210) E.L.T. 122 (Bom.), we are of the opinion that this appeal raises substantial questions of law. It is accordingly admitted on the following substantial questions of law :- (i) Whether CESTAT was justified in applying the ratio of this Hon ble High Court judgment in Indorama Synthetics [2007 (219) E.L.T. 122 (Bom) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|