2015 (1) TMI 800

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ermitted him to withdraw Special Civil Application and extended time to make payment of pre-deposit. Therefore, it is factually incorrect to say that in the order, it is wrongly mentioned that “the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.” Therefore, there is no question of rectifying the order as requested. - Rectification denied. - Misc. Civil Application (For Review) No. 88 of 2014 in Special Civil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the words petition is dismissed as withdrawn and to correct the date of compliance as 16-1-2014 in place of 16-1-2013. 3. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant. 4. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the main Special Civil Application No. 18031 of 2013 was argued by one Mr. Ramesh Nair, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant - original petiti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... due to typographical error the compliance date is wrongly mentioned as 16-1-2013 instead of 16-1-2014 . Under the circumstances, to that extent the earlier order dated 13-12-2013 passed in Special Civil Application No. 18031 of 2013 is rectified and in the said order, in place of 16-1-2013 , it should be read as 16-1-2014 . 7. The present application is partly allowed to the aforesaid exte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X