9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 28X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... upervisory jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, is bound by the order passed by this Court. The order impugned in the appeal shows that the CESTAT took note of the fact that there was no stay of the order precedent writ. The said order, though on appeal, is not under stay. Therefore, in all fairness, the appellant should actually treat the order of revocation of licence to be un ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 004. The licence was suspended by an order dated 12-9-2012. 4. Subsequently, a show cause notice for revocation of licence was issued on 6-12-2012. The show cause notice was challenged before this Court, in W.P. (MD) No. 16351 of 2012. The said writ petition was allowed on 4-1-2013, solely on the ground of limitation. 5. Therefore, challenging the order of suspension, dated 12-9-2012, the re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llenged the revocation of licence by way of a writ petition and the writ petition was allowed by this Court. That order is on appeal in a writ appeal. 8. The suspension order was challenged by the respondent before CESTAT. The CESTAT allowed the appeal by following the decision rendered in the writ petition on the ground that the action was time barred. CESTAT being a quasi-judicial authority, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
