9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 75X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntention of the appellant of the amendment of the year 2013 to Section 8 thereof but has not adjudicated on the said aspect. - senior counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner agrees that the impugned order be set aside and the writ petition filed by the respondent / writ petitioner as well as this appeal be disposed of by directing the Appellate Authority under the PMLA to decide the appeal already preferred by the respondent / writ petitioner against the order aforesaid of attachment of properties within the time to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal by setting aside the impugned order / judgment and by disposing of the writ petition (from which this appeal arises) filed by the respondent / writ petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n came up before the learned Single Judge on 19th September, 2014, when the counsel for the appellant appeared on advance notice. The learned Single Judge, after hearing the counsel for the parties, on the very same day disposed of the writ petition holding that the continued attachment of the property was unsustainable. However, inspite of such a finding, the learned Single Judge in the penultimate paragraph of the judgment observed In the circumstances, it prima facie appears that the attachment order ought to be vacated and finding that the respondent / writ petitioner had filed a representation before the appellant in this regard and which had not been disposed of, disposed of the writ petition by directing the appellant to dispose of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the learned ASG. 11. After some hearing, the senior counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner agrees that the impugned order be set aside and the writ petition filed by the respondent / writ petitioner as well as this appeal be disposed of by directing the Appellate Authority under the PMLA to decide the appeal already preferred by the respondent / writ petitioner against the order aforesaid of attachment of properties within the time to be fixed by this Court. It is contended that arguments were heard in the appeal long back and order is reserved. 12. It is further agreed between the counsels that since considerable time has lapsed, an opportunity be also given to the parties to make further arguments, if needed, before the Appell ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
