2015 (3) TMI 520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioner has chosen to file the application under Section 84 of the Act for rectification of the impugned order and if the impugned order is set aside on the ground raised by the petitioner, the petition filed under Section 84 would become infructuous. From the records, I find that a detailed order has been passed by the respondent and it is not required any interference by this Court. Even .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tunity of personal hearing to the petitioner to put forth his contentions. However, on going through the impugned order, it appears that an opportunity was not given to the petitioner. The impugned order was passed on 19.11.2014 and the same was received by the petitioner on 23.11.2014. The petitioner, against the impugned order, instead of preferring an appeal before the appellate authority quest .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to entertain the writ petition. 4. Heard both sides. 5. When admittedly, the petitioner has chosen to file the application under Section 84 of the Act for rectification of the impugned order and if the impugned order is set aside on the ground raised by the petitioner, the petition filed under Section 84 would become infructuous. F .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X