9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 121X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Ms. L. Charanaya , Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Prashanth S. Shivadass, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Yashank Adharu , Sr.Adv. Ms. Mennakshi Grover, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi , Adv. Ms. Pooja Sharma ,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. ORDER In C.A.No. 8484/2003 The appellant/assessee is the manufacturer of Earth Moving equipments which the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... decided by the CEGAT against the assessee. This is how the assessee is before us challenging the order of the CEGAT. When the matter was called out for hearing we were informed that after the remand the Assistant Commissioner had again reiterated the demand though reduced the quantum to rupees seventy four lakhs. However, against that order appeal was filed by the assessee before the CEGAT and t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hom this appeal is granted for arguments. He has appeared in C.A.No.8484 /2003, at our request he has agreed to appear in the other appeal as well. The learned counsel seeks two days' time to prepare that case. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1996 OF 2006 Dated : March 20, 2015 We have heard learned counsel for the parties at great length. We find that the CESTAT has allowed the appeal of the respondent h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
