9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (9) TMI 907X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... correctness of Ext.P10, it was for the petitioner to pursue the same before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. This Court, after three years, does not find any reason to interfere with Ext.P10, in exercise of the discretionary jurisdiction. Interference is declined - Decided against Petitioner. - W.P. (C) NO. 9157 OF 2014 (T) - - - Dated:- 16-9-2014 - P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g, dumping, dozing and compaction for a total sum of 10,06,50,000/-. According to the petitioner, it is nothing but a 'works contract' and the petitioner is eligible to have the tax satisfied at the compounded rates under Section 8(a) (i) of the Act, instead of assessment under Section 6 of the Act. The same was considered and sanction was given by the competent authority. It was subsequen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was there, they could invoke the remedy under Section 66 of the Act. It was in the said circumstances, that the matter was disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the objections and to have the matter finalised accordingly. 4. Pursuant to Ext.P7,notice of hearing was issued to the petitioner vide Ext.P8. Petitioner submitted Ext.P9 objection and this led to Ext.P10 order cancell ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e compounding option once exercised for the assessment year 2008-09; (4) to issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem to be fit, just and necessary in the circumstances of this case and in the interests of justice; and (5) call for the records of the case leading to Ext.P10 rectification order, declare the same to be illegal and non est in the eye of law and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
