1974 (2) TMI 79

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the order of detention passed on the petitioner by the District Magistrate, 24 Parganas, under Section 3(2) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 (for short, the Act) read with Sub-section (1) thereof. 2. One point urged was that there was a delay of five months between the first incident relied upon in the grounds in support of the detention and the actual order of detention, b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nexure to the detention order give sufficient particulars to enable an effective representation contra. 4. The point that the associates of the petitioner in his prejudicial adventures were not named in the particulars furnished also has no legal force (vide this Court's decision in Hasan Ali v. State of West Bengal) . 5. The other plea that the grounds or particulars mentioned by the Di .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nfluenced the detaining authority and the higher authorities in directing or affirming the detention. We see nothing now as having been relied upon by the authorities under the Act and all that is stated in paragraph 7 of the State affidavit in return has in substance been communicated to the petitioner. 7. The plea that the detenu has been undergoing incarceration for a long time since the mid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X