Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (11) TMI 1067

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r of inputs, input invoice, etc., and as such production records are not co-relatable to the exports in question. Government observes that as per the conditions of said notification, the manufacturer or processor shall obtain the materials to be utilized in the manufacture of finished goods intended for export, directly from the registered factory in which such goods are produced accompanied by an invoice under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Exporter claimed to have complied with the said requirement. Department has not countered the said claim of respondent. So, it cannot be said that use of duty paid inputs in the manufacture of export goods is not established - respondents are rightly held eligible for input stage rebate under No .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.), dated 6-9-2004 and the amount of rebate claim in the said ARE-1 s was shown as NIL. Subsequently, vide impugned Order-in-Original, Original authority rejected the said rebate claim. 3. Being aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original, applicant filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals), who decided the same in favour of respondent. 4. Being aggrieved by the impugned Order-in-Appeal, the applicant/department has filed this revision application under Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 before Central Government on the following grounds : 4.1 The Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to appreciate that as per said notification, under procedure for export, it is prescribed that the goods shall be exported on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hority on going through the said Batch Production Records has observed that the said Batch Production Records does not contain the vital information such as name of supplier of inputs, input invoice nos., duty amount per unit and duty amount paid. The said Batch Production Records are also not co-relatable to the export in question inasmuch as the none of the details pertaining to the export such as commercial invoice Nos., ARE Nos. etc. are mentioned in the said Batch Manufacturing Records. 4.3 The Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to appreciate that in view of the foregoing facts it is evident that from the said Batch Manufacturing Records consumption of inputs towards utilization of export goods are not substantiated and the duty paid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... so pleaded that batch production records does not contain the vital information, such as name of supplier of inputs, input invoice, etc., and as such production records are not co-relatable to the exports in question. Government observes that as per the conditions of said notification, the manufacturer or processor shall obtain the materials to be utilized in the manufacture of finished goods intended for export, directly from the registered factory in which such goods are produced accompanied by an invoice under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Exporter claimed to have complied with the said requirement. Department has not countered the said claim of respondent. So, it cannot be said that use of duty paid inputs in the manufacture of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tiate their claim and is required in ARE-2. All the details necessary to arrive at the calculation are incorporated in the said calculation sheet. Thus, the applicants are eligible to the rebate claim despite the facts that they exported the goods on ARE-1 s. 9. There are catena of court s judgments that in export related schemes like rebate, benefit of such schemes should not be denied for procedural infraction, if substantial conditions of that scheme are complied with. In the instant case, export of goods under cover of ARE-1 instead of ARE-2, may be considered as procedure infractions, especially when substantial conditions of the Notification No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.) has been fulfilled. Government concurs with the findings of Commis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates