2010 (7) TMI 960

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... two appeals are filed against order-in-appeal No. 70/2007 (V-I) C.E., dated 3-8-2007. 2. Appeal No. E/780/2007 is filed by the assessee while appeal No. E/786/2007 is filed by the Revenue. 3. Since both the appeals are directed against the very same order-in-appeal, they are being disposed of by a common order. 4. Learned counsel submits that the issue involved in this case is regarding .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CDR while justifying the impugned order submits that once Cenvat credit has been taken on the goods which are brought into the factory premises and subsequently they are cleared and when they get destroyed, the reversal of Cenvat credit is justified. As regards the appeal filed by the Revenue, it is his submission that there cannot be any pro rata Cenvat credit which can be reversed. It is his sub .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... paid. The provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002/2004 envisages only the use of the inputs in or in relation to the final product. If that be so, the inputs i.e. bottles if they subsequently get broken at the hands of the dealers or at the unit of assessee, there cannot be any demand of reversal of Cenvat credit from the assessee. This flows from the entire scheme of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X