2015 (8) TMI 780

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ase of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs v. Stovec Industries Ltd., reported in 2013 (1) TMI 72 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT held that in view of instruction dated 17-8-2011, tax appeal involving amount below ₹ 10 lakh was not maintainable and this instruction also applies to pending appeal – Amount in current case being less than ₹ 10.00 Lakh appeal hereby dismissed – Answered in favou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT for short). Refund amount of ₹ 7,29,567/- was allowed vide order dated 25-9-02. Appeal was preferred against the said order and the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the said appeal by order dated 7-4-2005. On the basis of the same show cause notice was issued to the assessee calling upon the respondent as to why refund amount of ₹ 7,29,567/- gra .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he order dated 25-9-02. The said order dated 24-8-05 was challenged before the CESTAT who, vide order dated 18/25-8-06 has set aside the Order-in-Appeal. Being aggrieved by the said order dated 18/25-8-06, the Revenue has preferred this appeal before this court. 4. A Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Customs v. Stovec Industries Ltd., reported in 201 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X