2015 (8) TMI 826

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t:- Without entering into issue qua retesting being permissible under law or not, interest of substantial justice would be served by requiring respondent no.2 to take decision on applications made by petitioner without being influenced by any of observations made by parties – Application of petitioner to be decided by respondent no.2 strictly in accordance with provisions applicable – Petition dis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espondent no.5 i.e. Central Revenue Control Laboratory, New Delhi. Petitioner appears to be dissatisfied with the testing of the samples done by respondent no.5 i.e. Central Revenue Control Laboratory, New Delhi. Learned counsel for the department however, points out that there cannot be a direction for re-testing unless it is so permitted under law and it is for the concerned authority to d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X