2015 (8) TMI 859

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent ORDER P.C. Having heard Mr.Kotangale in support of the Appeal and Mr.Naniwadekar appearing on behalf of the Assessee, we are of the opinion that all the three questions and which have been framed by the Revenue and set out at pages 6 & 7 of the Paper Book are not substantial questions of law. 2. The order dated 4 May 2012, from which this Appeal arises, considers the deduction under sect .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion under section 80IB(10), Tulsi Project will also be entitled for the same. 5. In such circumstances, any wider question or controversy does not arise for determination in the peculiar facts. All the three questions, therefore, stand answered already against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the Division Bench of this Court. The Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X