TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 904X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that there was no name of the Advocate mentioned as against the parties’ description. Thus, there was no mistake or error in printing of the daily board. The matter was notified in terms of the computerized programme. In such circumstances, it was solely the responsibility of the applicant to have remained present and the absence of the Advocate does not mean that this Court should necessarily pro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e being no procedural lapse. It is not the case of the applicant that this Court dismissed the appeal when the name of the Advocate or the parties were incorrectly printed or that there was no name of the Advocate mentioned as against the parties description. Thus, there was no mistake or error in printing of the daily board. The matter was notified in terms of the computerized programme. In such ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|