9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 905X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed order - Violation of principle of natural justice - Opportunity of hearing not granted - Held that:- The petitioner is correct in her submission that the respondents have passed the impugned order behind the back of the petitioner, without affording an opportunity of personal hearing. When the unit at Coimbatore was closed down way back in the year 2009, and thereafter, they have been functioni ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e ground that the order in original was an exparte order, passed without hearing the petitioner and such an order is against the principles of natural justice. According to the petitioner, no notice of hearing was issued by the first respondent for personal hearing. Since the recovery notice is a consequential order of the order in original, the same is liable to be quashed. 2. The learned counse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the same is liable to be set aside. The learned counsel prayed that the respondents may be directed to provide all reasonable opportunities to the petitioner. 3. Mr. A.P. Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that the recovery notice dated 4.2.2015 was passed as a consequential order to the order in or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 11.2011 is quashed. Consequently, the recovery notice dated 4.2.2015 is also quashed. 5. Personal hearing of the petitioner is fixed on 15th June 2015 at the adjudicating office at Coimbatore. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Adjudicating Officer on the said date and extend their full cooperation for completion of the proceedings. After providing personal hearing, it is open to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
