2005 (9) TMI 628

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ellant. Shri V. Deivasigamani, Corporate Manager, for the Respondent. ORDER The Commissioner (Appeals) vide his impugned order has held as under : - I have carefully considered the facts of the case, the findings of the adjudicating authority, submissions of the appellants and the law on the subject. I find that the issue is settled by the Hon ble Tribunal in the appellant s own .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... me Court. Shri R.B. Pardeshi, learned DR appearing for the Revenue, fairly agrees that the appeal filed by them before the Supreme Court stands rejected, as reported in CCE, Goa Chennai v. MRF Ltd. - 2005 (180) E.L.T. 145 (S.C.). As such no interference is called for in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The Revenue s appeal is rejected. The cross objection filed by the respondent also sta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X