2004 (6) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (2) Service tax along with interest and penalty
[Order].  -This appeal has been directed by the Revenue against the impugned order-in-appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has modified the order-in-original of the adjudicating authority who confirmed the demand of Rs. 78,285/- under Section 68 of the Service Tax Act against the respondents with penalty of Rs. 100/- per day under Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ity confirmed the demand by holding that the case of the respondents was covered under Section 68 of the Act and as such they are liable to pay the Service Tax. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has reversed that order by holding that by sub-letting of a portion of the site by the respondents which they had taken from the Municipal Corporation, did not amount to providing of any service by them w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ents had provided service by way of letting them the site which is connected with the advertisement. It is also evident even from the record that they have raised bills against two companies, namely, M/s. Pioneer Publicity Corpn. and M/s. Punjab Advertising Co., but still did not discharge the service tax liability in respect of those bills. The Commissioner (Appeals) has even confirmed the servic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X