TMI Blog2015 (9) TMI 397X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es for issue of H Card had enclosed forged documents with application – Held that:- appellant authorities accepted and believed that certificate was genuine and validly issued certificate which was accepted by respondent employer – There was no allegation that there was collusion or respondent employer was aware that certificate was forged and fabricated – No substantial question of law arises for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... posed for violation of Regulation 19(1) and 19(8) of the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulation, 2004. Respondent company had employed one Alijah Taqvi. It appears that the said employee had applied to Customs Authorities for issue of H Card on 19th January, 2008 and had enclosed Class XII Pass Certificate with the application. The said Senior Secondary School Certificate was purportedly issued ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Tribunal recorded in this regard is factual and there is no allegation that there was collusion or the respondent employer was aware that the certificate was forged and fabricated and still they had given the undertaking. The amount involved is only ₹ 40,000/- and the decision of the Tribunal being factual, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. In these circumstances, we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|