2013 (1) TMI 755

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ORDER Shri Vivek Dalal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Shri P. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents on advance copy. 3. Heard on the question of admission. 4. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the interlocutory orders dated 7-8-2012 and 20-11-2012 passed by the second respondent. 5. Accordin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... details. 7. In our considered view, in view of powers conferred under Section 32-I of the Central Excise Act, the orders passed by the second respondent Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission cannot be said to be illegal or without jurisdiction. 8. In the circumstances, no case for interference is made out to interfere into the aforesaid impugned interlocutory orders. However .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X