2015 (9) TMI 512

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Veiling Duty (CVD) was paid; though mistakenly at rate of 10% – Assertion of petitioner is that, notification had been issued by respondents, whereby CVD, on RO membrane, for household type filters, had been reduced to 6% – Petitioner seeks direction for reassessment of 7 bills of entries – Held that:- Court inclined to direct respondents to dispose of representations of petitioners –Needful will .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... usehold type filters. 4.1 The petitioner further avers that import of RO membrane filter has taken place between 17.03.2012 and 11.07.2014. 4.2 The petitioner s case, however, is confined to 7 bills of entries pursuant to which imports were made during the period spanning between 10.07.2014 and 12.10.2014. 4.3 The petitioner claims that, at that stage Counter Veiling Duty (CVD) was paid; .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed counsel for the petitioner relies upon an order of the Division Bench, dated 06.02.2015, passed in WP(C) 3764/2014, titled : Mohit Overseas Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Anr. 4.8 The petitioner, in these circumstances, seeks a direction for reassessment of the aforementioned 7 bills of entries. 5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, I am inclined to direct the respondents to d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X