TMI Blog2008 (9) TMI 930X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is directed against the final order No. 94-103/05-B passed on 01.02.2005 by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi. We have heard the counsel for the parties and have examined the impugned order. We find that the tribunal has returned a finding of fact that the revenue has not succeeded in proving that the fully manufactured good ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... such customer has been brought on record. Consequently, the tribunal concluded that the revenue has not been able to prove its charge against M/s Bihariji Manufacturing Pvt Ltd. and M/s Hindustan Silicate and Chemicals of clandestine removal of the goods in question. Resultantly, there is no question of any duty being demanded from them and that the goods seized from their premises were also not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|